International Network for the study of Credibility, Ethos and Trust
Selected publications
This is your Project Page. It's a great opportunity to help visitors understand the context and background of your latest work. Double click on the text box to start editing your content and make sure to add all the relevant details you want to share.
Christopher W. Tindale
The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception - Chapter 8
​
Out of the Space of Reasons: Argumentation, Agents and Persons
Character and Knowledge: Learning from the Speech of Experts
Presentation
Mere Dispositions: Durability and the Teaching of Values
Jens Elmelund Kjeldsen
Expert uncertainty: Arguments bolstering the ethos of expertise in situations of uncertainty.
"Expert ethos and the strength of networks: negotiations of credibility in mediated debate on COVID-19” (Forthoming, 2021) Kjeldsen, J.E.*, Ihlen, Ø; Just, S.N.; and, Larsson, A.O. In Health Promotion International, 2021, 1–11. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab0​
​
Kjeldsen, J. E.*, Mølster, R. Ihlen, Ø. (Forthcoming, 2021). Expert uncertainty: Arguments bolstering the ethos of expertise in situations of uncertainty. In Oswald, S., Lewinski, M., Greco, S. & Villata, S. (Eds.), The Pandemic of Argumentation. Springer.
Johanna Hartelius
The Gifting Logos: Expertise in the Digital Commons
Hartelius, E. Johanna. The Gifting Logos:Expertise in the Digital Commons. University of California Press, 2020. (226 pages). REVIEWED HERE: Johnson, Jeremy David. “Review of The Gifting Logos: Expertise in the Digital Commons (University of California Press, 2020).” Argumentation and Advocacy (2021): https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2021.1905941
​
Deliberative Stakeholder Engagement in Health Research
Mitchell, Gordon R., E. Johanna Hartelius, Andrew Allsup, David McCoy, and Kathleen M. McTigue. “Deliberative Stakeholder Engagement in Health Research.” Social Epistemology (2021)
​
Digitality, Diversity, and the Future of Rhetoric and Public Address
Hartelius, E. Johanna, Jessica H. Lu, Damien Smith Pfister, and Carly S. Woods. “Digitality, Diversity, and the Future of Rhetoric and Public Address.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 24.1-2 (2021): forthcoming
Aaron Hess
Critical-Rhetorical Ethnography: Rethinking the Place and Process of Rhetoric
Hess, A. (2011). Critical-rhetorical ethnography: Rethinking the place and process of rhetoric. Communication Studies, 62, 127-152. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.529750
​
Hess, A. (2010). Democracy through the lens of the camcorder: Argumentation and vernacular spectacle on YouTube in the 2008 election. Argumentation & Advocacy, 47, 106-122.
​
On the dance of rhetoric: Ethnography, embodiment, and effect
​Hess, A. (2015). On the dance of rhetoric: Ethnography, embodiment, and effect. In D. Houck & A. Kiewe (Eds.), The effects of rhetoric and the rhetoric of effects: Past, present and future (pp. 239-266). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Iben Brinch
Changing Place Identity by Visual Design? A Rhetorical Field Study of a Post-Industrial Place Development Project
Jørgensen, Iben Brinch (2021). Changing Place Identity by Visual Design? A Rhetorical Field Study of a Post-Industrial Place Development Project. In Mcclellan, Erin Daina; Shin, Yongjun & Chandler, Curry (red.) Urban Communication Reader IV: Cities as Communicative Change Agents, s. 269-289. Peter Lang Publishing Group.
Skrivning som metode
Jørgensen, Iben Brinch (2020). Skrivning som metode. I Bengtsson, Mette; Berg, Kristine Marie & Iversen, Stefan (ed.) Retorik og metode, s. 281-301. Samfundslitteratur.
Seriffer og sjiraffer. Stilistikkens plass i akademisk skriving
Jørgensen, Iben Brinch (2019b). Seriffer og sjiraffer. Stilistikkens plass i akademisk skriving. I Jørgensen, Iben Brinch & Askeland, Norunn (red.) Kreativ akademisk skriving, 104-125. Universitetsforlaget (Oslo). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215031613-2019-06
​
Øyvind Ihlen
(Ihlen, Ø., & Raknes, K. (2022). The game of goodwill: An exploratory study of discursive strategies of interest organizations in a consensus democracy. Interest Groups & Advocacy. DOI: 10.1057/s41309-022-00153-4)
Kjeldsen, J. E., Ihlen, Ø., Just, S. N., & Larsson, A. A. O. (2021). Expert ethos and the strength of networks: negotiations of credibility in mediated debate on COVID-19. Health Promotion International. doi:10.1093/heapro/daab095
​
Offerdal, T. S., Just, S. N., & Ihlen, Ø. (2021). Public ethos in the pandemic rhetorical situation: Strategies for building trust in authorities' risk communication. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 4(2), 247-270. doi:10.30658/jicrcr.4.2.3
​
Using rhetorical situations to examine and improve vaccination communication
Ihlen, Ø., Toledano, M., & Nørholm, S. J. (2021). Using rhetorical situations to examine and improve vaccination communication. Frontiers in Communication. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2021.697383
​
Ihlen, Ø., Binderkrantz, A., & Öberg, P. (2021). Lobbying in Scandinavia. In E. Skogerbø, Ø. Ihlen, N. N. Kristensen, & L. W. Nord (Eds.), Power, communication, and politics in the Nordic countries (pp. 305–323). NORDICOM.
Ruth Amossy
Images de soi dans le discours. La construction de l’ethos
Ruth Amossy (ed). 1999, Images de soi dans le discours. La construction de l’ethos (Lausanne : Delachaux et Niestlé, coll. Sciences des discours), 215 p.
Translation into Portuguese : Imagens de si no discurso. A construção do ethos, 2005. Ruth Amossy (org.) (São Paulo : Contexto, 205 p.)
​
La présentation de soi. Ethos et identité verbale
Ruth Amossy, 2010. La présentation de soi. Ethos et identité verbale (Paris : PUF), 233 p.
Translation into Spanish : Ruth Amossy, 2018. La presentación de sí. Ethos e identidad verbal (Traducción Paula Salerno), Buenos Aires : Prometeo Libros, 220 p.
​
Ethos collectif et identités sociales
Ruth Amossy et Eithan Orkibi. 2021. Ethos collectif et identités sociales (Paris : Classiques Garnier), 220 p.
​
L’ethos et ses doubles contemporains. Perspectives disciplinaires
Ruth Amossy, 2014. « L’ethos et ses doubles contemporains. Perspectives disciplinaires », L’ethos discursif, Yana Grinshpun (dir). Langage et société 149, 13-30
Sine N. Just
Lantz, P. M. V. & S. N. Just (2021): Getting the Timing Right: Kairos as the Rhetorical Framing of Time. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 37(3): 1-14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2021.101167
Kjeldsen, J. E., Ø. Ihlen, S. N. Just & A. O. Larsson (2021): Expert Ethos and the Strength of Networks: Negotiations of Credibility in Mediated Debate on Covid-19. Health Promotion International, https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab095.